Cases 71 - 80 of 195
Rogers v. Sterling
as 2:2020cv01508
Defendant:
Bryan Sterling
Plaintiff:
Hayward L Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maness v. Williams et al
as 1:2020cv01448
Plaintiff:
Don Sherrill Maness, III and Jibril Muhammad
Defendant:
Classification Green, Assoc. Warden Turner, Assoc. Warden Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Stirling et al
as 0:2020cv01158
Defendant:
Anthony Burton, Bryan Stirling and Bryan Sterling
Plaintiff:
James R. Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Sterling
as 5:2020cv00951
Plaintiff:
Teron H Jackson and Teron Hakeem Jackson
Defendant:
Bryan Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arrington v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2020cv00824
Plaintiff:
Sterling Arrington
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Owens v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00476
Defendant:
Officer Cokly, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan Sterling and others
Plaintiff:
Marco Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Williams et al
as 9:2019cv02840
Defendant:
Sgt. Dana Knowlin, Cpt. Jordan Williams, Sgt. Wellington Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Sterling L. Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. Cowabunga Inc et al
as 4:2019cv02753
Defendant:
Cowabunga Inc and Domino's Pizza Inc
Plaintiff:
Sterling Moses
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Sterling et al
as 0:2019cv02720
Respondent:
Bryan Sterling, Bryan Stiriling, Jeannine Price and others
Petitioner:
Dennis Rodger Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Golson v. Campbell et al
as 1:2019cv02477
Defendant:
Brian P. Sterling, Joy Campbell and Tammy Way
Plaintiff:
Eddie Clay Golson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.