Cases 71 - 80 of 148
Matthews v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2016cv02934
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Matthews, Sr
Defendant:
3M Company , Bayer Cropscience Inc , CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stone Law Firm, LLC v. YP Advertising & Publishing, LLC
as 3:2016cv02757
Plaintiff:
Stone Law Firm, LLC
Defendant:
YP Advertising & Publishing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stone v. Charleston Miyabi Inc et al
as 2:2016cv02129
Plaintiff:
William Stone , Adam Berry , Nicholas Mazzilli and others
Defendant:
Charleston Miyabi Inc , Capital Japan Inc , Koichiro Hirao and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Stone v. USA
as 4:2016cv02009
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel Aaron Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv00806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Linder v. Stone et al
as 2:2015cv04619
Plaintiff:
Stanley D Linder
Defendant:
Isaac McDuffy Stone, III, Harris Beach, Sean Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Singleton v. Renfroe et al
as 2:2015cv04558
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Singleton
Defendant:
Jamie Renfroe , Matthew Stone , Nakia Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 2:2015cv02532
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Alexander Brown
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of , North Charleston Police Department , R E Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone Spine & Disc Imaging LLC et al v. DMX-Works Imaging Inc et al
as 2:2015cv02192
Plaintiff:
Stone Spine & Disc Imaging LLC , Martin Stone and Jason Stone
Defendant:
DMX-Works Imaging Inc and John Postlewaite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Morales-Perez v. Stone Forestry Services Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00948
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Morales-Perez
Defendant:
Stone Forestry Services Inc, Juan Campos and Randy Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
