Cases 71 - 80 of 1,462
Gibson v. Collado et al
as 1:2023cv06971
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gibson
Defendant:
Warden J. Collado, Luis Molina, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunbar v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv00908
Petitioner:
Naaron Dunbar
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv00898
Petitioner:
Storm Rivera
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv00883
Petitioner:
Alexander Holmes
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tatum v. Superintendent, G.H.C.F.
as 1:2023cv00733
Petitioner:
Tyrae Tatum
Respondent:
Superintendent, G.H.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodwin v. Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv06340
Petitioner:
Ken Goodwin
Respondent:
Superintendent, Five Points Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barletta v. Superintendent
as 7:2023cv06260
Petitioner:
Daniel Barletta
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Superintendent
as 9:2023cv00863
Petitioner:
Craig Thompson
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional Facility
as 1:2023cv05921
Petitioner:
Quahsym Parker
Respondent:
Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levesque v. Auburn Correctional Facility, et al
as 9:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
Andre Rene Levesque
Defendant:
Auburn Correctional Facility, Superintendant Joseph Corey, DSA Nupoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
