Cases 71 - 80 of 2,571
Screen v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv03094
Plaintiff:
Scott Screen
Defendant:
United States of America
Banks v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv03039
Plaintiff:
Anthony Levin Banks
Defendant:
United States of America
Aurel v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv03037
Plaintiff:
Aurel Mich and Mich Aurel
Defendant:
United States of America, Maryland State Prisoners Officers, C.O. Aliu Olatunji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Head v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv02973
Plaintiff:
Charles Head
Defendant:
Captain R. Rakowski, Jr., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Bennett v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv02929
Plaintiff:
Brian Bennett
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Melendez v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv02917
Plaintiff:
Luis Melendez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02825
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02826
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Omer v. United States of America et al.
as 8:2023cv02767
Plaintiff:
Tsegereda Omer
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Kentish Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 Federal Tort Claims Act - Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
