Cases 71 - 80 of 100
THOMPKINS v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2014cv05920
Petitioner:
ALLEN THOMPKINS
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COPELAND v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2014cv05754
Petitioner:
YUSUF COPELAND
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF DELAWARE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLLAZO v. WINGARD et al
as 1:2014cv00210
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANGELO COLLAZO
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FONTROY v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2014cv00165
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DALE FONTROY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, RICHARD ELLIS, REX BETNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SKIBA v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2014cv01012
Petitioner:
MICHAEL SKIBA
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DEEP v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2014cv00831
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DEEP
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOOHER v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2014cv00823
Petitioner:
MICHAEL TODD BOOHER
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NICASTRO v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2014cv00732
Petitioner:
ROBERT JARRETT NICASTRO
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and TREVOR WINGARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SUTO v. WINGARD
as 2:2014cv00423
Petitioner:
ROBERT SUTO
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Heredia v. Wingard et al
as 1:2014cv00214
Petitioner:
Henry Heredia
Respondent:
Trevor Wingard and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
