Cases 71 - 80 of 107
Ray et al v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services et al
as 3:2014cv03578
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ray and Michelle Leeds
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Crandall Independent School District , Carmethia Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mangum v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
as 4:2014mc01748
Plaintiff:
Ceceilia Mangum
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
Finch v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission et al
as 4:2013mc02860
Plaintiff:
Dieter M Finch
Defendant:
Texas Health and Human Services Commision, Texas Departmetn of Health and Human Services System, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv04092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
as 3:2013cv04090
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv03163
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Haygood v. A Child is Born RTC et al
as 1:2012cv00922
Defendant:
A Child Is Born RTC, Child Protective Services Division of the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Doe 6 and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Haygood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
