Cases 71 - 80 of 3,179
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Perez v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
Edward Perez
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.- Ohio, Kerith Rashford and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 tm Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McNaughton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00610
Plaintiff:
Dwayne McNaughton
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 215 fl FLSA: Prohibited Acts
Stephens v. United Parcel Service Inc.
as 3:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Stephens
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Batieste v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Dante Batieste
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
