Cases 71 - 80 of 245
Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2018cv00519
Defendant:
Gerri Lynn Hardcastle, William G. Cobb, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2018cv02049
Defendant:
State of Nevada and NDOC
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kearney v. Abruzzo et al
as 3:2018cv00468
Defendant:
Louis Abruzzo and Benjamin Abruzzo
Plaintiff:
Victor Kearney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson et al v. Jobe et al
as 2:2018cv01790
Defendant:
G.D. Eastlick, Inc. and Edward Charles Jobe
Plaintiff:
Victor Gibson and Meskerem Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dodds et al v. US National Personal Care, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01517
Plaintiff:
Almeka Dodds and Linda Itric
Defendant:
US National Personal Care, LLC and Victor Vargas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tagle v. Corrections Corporation America et al
as 2:2018cv01031
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation America and David L. Myers
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00889
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tagle Sr v. Corrections Corporation America, et al
as 2:2018cv00871
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation America
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Tagle Sr v. Corrections Corporation America, et al
as 2:2018cv00872
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation America
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Tagle v. DHS et al
as 2:2018cv00815
Defendant:
Anselmo Abramsen, DHS, Megan T. Funk and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
