Cases 71 - 80 of 824
Jose Dolores Vargas v. Patwin Horn
as 2:2023cv00201
Petitioner:
Jose Dolores Vargas
Respondent:
Patwin Horn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Vargas v. Saputo Dairy Foods USA, LLC
as 1:2022cv01645
Plaintiff:
Nataly Lopez Vargas
Defendant:
Saputo Dairy Foods USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Merelo v. Ruiz et al
as 1:2022cv01579
Plaintiff:
Narissa Merelo and Narissa Melero
Defendant:
Gabriel Ruiz, Jose Vargas and County of Fresno Child Protective Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv07455
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv07453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
ADRIANA VARGAS v. SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING
as 5:2022cv02002
Plaintiff:
ADRIANA VARGAS
Defendant:
SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jose Vargas v. Radius Global Solutions LLC
as 2:2022cv08252
Plaintiff:
Jose Vargas
Defendant:
Radius Global Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vent v. Fletcher et al
as 3:2022cv01651
Plaintiff:
Kristen Vent
Defendant:
Nathan Fletcher, Nora Vargas, Terra Lawson Remer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 197
Vargas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022at00835
Plaintiff:
Ada Elizabeth Vargas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(SS) Vargas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01360
Plaintiff:
Ada Elizabeth Vargas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
