Cases 71 - 80 of 317
EIDMANN v. WALGREEN CO.
as 5:2020cv04805
Defendant:
WALGREEN CO.
Plaintiff:
CAMERON EIDMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Dublin et al v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 8:2020cv01202
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Ortho McNeil Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Dublin, City of Murrieta and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv04029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Peoria Public Schools District 150 et al v. JUUL Labs, Inc., et al
as 3:2020cv03321
Defendant:
Fontem Ventures B.V., BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO P.L.C., INC., Reynolds American Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MARION COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 2, PEORIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT 150, LA MOILLE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT 303 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neuhoff v. Walgreen Co.
as 4:2020cv02439
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Neuhoff
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Whittington v. Walgreen Co.
as 2:2020cv00600
Plaintiff:
Charles Whittington
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Irma Portillo Fragozza v. Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC, et al
as 2:2020cv02377
Defendant:
Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC, Walgreen Co. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Irma Portillo Fragozza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01842
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
