Cases 71 - 80 of 3,169
Goss v. Warden Greene
as 1:2024cv01133
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Petitioner:
Ronald Goss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goss v. Warden Greene
as 3:2024cv01133
Petitioner:
Ronald Goss
Respondent:
Warden Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Greene
as 1:2024cv01123
Petitioner:
Donte Delano Johnson
Respondent:
Warden J. Greene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ibrahim v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv01124
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI-Allenwood Low
Petitioner:
Ibrahim Nasr Ibrahim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00151
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00150
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Waters v. Talutto et al
as 1:2024cv01113
Defendant:
Pigga, Lt. J. Lando, Warden Talutto and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00149
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02878
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ENDRIKAT v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and WARDEN SCI ALBION
Petitioner:
ROBERT ENDRIKAT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
