Cases 71 - 80 of 707
Flores, Ramon v. Warden of FCI - Oxford
as 3:2024cv00330
Respondent:
Warden of FCI - Oxford
Petitioner:
Ramon Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. McGibbon et al
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Arnold C Thompson
Defendant:
Warden E Barber, Warden M Gierach, CO McGibbon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Taylor
as 2:2024cv00596
Respondent:
Warden Taylor
Petitioner:
Demetrus Pickens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cervantes v. Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
as 3:2024cv00323
Respondent:
Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
Petitioner:
Rafael Cervantes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 f
Schiller v. Tegels
as 2:2024cv00591
Petitioner:
Mr. Frank Schiller
Respondent:
Warden Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alward v. FCI Oxford et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward and Matthew Keith Berry
Defendant:
FCI Oxford, Lt Broesch and Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins, Eric v. Fuchs, Warden
as 3:2024cv00301
Petitioner:
Eric G. Perkins
Respondent:
Warden Fuchs
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Forester-Hoare v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Sean Forester-Hoare
Defendant:
Dr Freeman, Dr Lavoie, Baier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haire v. Hepp
as 1:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Trais Fernandez Haire
Defendant:
Warden Hepp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orji, Michael v. Warden, FCI Oxford et al
as 3:2024cv00300
Petitioner:
Michael Afram Orji
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Oxford and I.C.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
