Cases 71 - 80 of 93
Mauricio v. Weber County et al
as 1:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mauricio
Defendant:
Weber County, Weber County Jail and FNU Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slater v. Weber County Utah et al
as 1:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Slater
Defendant:
Weber County Utah, Craig L. Dearden, Jan M. Zogmaister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stone v. Weber County Utah et al
as 1:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stone
Defendant:
Weber County Utah, Craig L. Dearden, Jan M. Zogmaister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry v. Weber County Utah et al
as 1:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Daniel Larry
Defendant:
Weber County Utah, Craig L. Dearden, Jan M. Zogmaister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lobato v. Weber County et al
as 1:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lobato
Defendant:
Weber County, Craig L. Dearden, Jan M. Zogmaister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Weber County et al
as 1:2011cv00021
Plaintiff:
Frank Donald Williams
Defendant:
Weber County , Craig L. Dearden , Jan M. Zogmaister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States v. VanDam
as 10-4078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UTAHNS FOR ETHICAL GOVERNMENT, a Utah Political Issues Committee
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL B. BARTON, Beaver County Clerk, ROBERT P. PERO, Carbon County Clerk, DIANE FRESTON, Duchesne County Clerk and others
Smith v. Third Judicial District Court Clerks et al
as 2:2010cv00253
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith
Defendant:
Third Judicial District Court Clerks, Weber County Correctional Complex and Weber County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eisenhour v. Weber County et al
as 1:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
Marcia Eisenhour
Defendant:
Weber County and Craig D. Storey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
