Cases 71 - 80 of 1,189
Brown v. USA
as 1:2022cv00325
Petitioner:
Mason Charles Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Brown v. Simpson County Justice Court et al
as 3:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
Nicholas D. Brown
Defendant:
Simpson County Justice Court and Honorable Charles Savell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. The ESAB Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00155
Defendant:
Enovis Corporation, The ESAB Group, Inc., Colfax Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Caleb Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brown v. Unknown
as 5:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Clara Brown
Defendant:
Unknown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Brazier, MD et al
as 4:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Demario Dontez Walker
Defendant:
Dr. William T. Brazier, MD, Dr. Gloria Perry, MD, Dr. Guardial Sandhu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Brown
as 1:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Montrez Brown
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Alexander v. Dominos Pizza et al
as 3:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Chad Alexander
Defendant:
Dominos Pizza, Davis Pizza Enterprises, Brett Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Barnes v. Banks et al
as 2:2022cv00141
Plaintiff:
Curtis Barnes
Defendant:
Eric Banks and Unknown Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnes v. Banks et al
as 2:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
Curtis Landra Barnes
Defendant:
Eric Banks and Officer Unknown Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States of America v. Brown
as 4:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alexis Brown
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
