Cases 71 - 80 of 2,042
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fields v. USA
as 5:2023cv00285
Petitioner:
William Fields
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stull v. Elkins
as 5:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Johnny Stull
Defendant:
William Elkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
United State of America et al v. SAF, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
United States of America and William E. Groves Construction, LLC
Defendant:
SAF, Inc. and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Bonds of contractors of public buildings
Barton et al v. Kusnezov et al
as 7:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Barton and Barbara Gayle Barton
Defendant:
Nicholas A. Kusnezov, M.D., Kenneth J. Koval, M.D., William Dreibelbis, PA-C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Lee v. Meador et al
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
William Ray Lee
Defendant:
Tim Meador, Dewayne Stone, Josh Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
T.K. v. Prime Hydration, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
T.K.
Defendant:
Prime Hydration, LLC, Congo Brands, LLC, Logan Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
