Cases 71 - 80 of 137
Melson v. Morgan County DHR et al
as 5:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
Van Wayne Melson
Defendant:
Morgan County DHR, Jennifer Howell, Michael Wilhelm and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagwell v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv00249
Plaintiff:
Chris Bagwell
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Stubbs and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fair v. Bankston et al
as 4:2014cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lynn Fair
Defendant:
Dewayne Bankston and Matt Cooper
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minniefield v. Lingo
as 4:2014cv00159
Plaintiff:
John E Minniefield
Defendant:
Bobby R Lingo
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Cornelison et al
as 4:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Robert Carroll, JR
Defendant:
Billy J Cornelison and John A Mason
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Baldwin et al
as 2:2014cv00110
Plaintiff:
David Boy Fuller
Defendant:
Baldwin, Poe, Dimi and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddins v. State of Alabama
as 2:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
Gregory Eddins
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparks v. Ingle et al
as 5:2014cv00013
Plaintiff:
Stacy Allen Sparks
Defendant:
Rodney Ingle, Chris Whitley and Fayette County Commission
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langford v. McCracken
as 6:2013cv02215
Plaintiff:
Curtis Langford
Defendant:
Joy McCracken
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Kirk et al
as 7:2013cv01909
Plaintiff:
Orville Dwaine Patterson
Defendant:
S. Kirk, James Whitley, Corizon Healthcare and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
