Cases 71 - 80 of 30,318
Moorman v. Raglin et al
as 3:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Kir Moorman
Defendant:
Raglin and Darth
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. South Bend Indiana et al
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Victor D Phillips, Jr
Defendant:
South Bend Indiana, Indiana The State of, Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Callahan v. Dart et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
William M Callahan, II
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUDDER v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00677
Petitioner:
TAMMY J. SCUDDER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WIGGINTON v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN WIGGINTON
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., MARK SEVIER, CENTURION HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUNSFORD v. BLACKBURN et al
as 1:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
SCOTTIE LUNSFORD
Defendant:
BLACKBURN, HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF, CENTURION MEDICAL STAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00660
Petitioner:
LONNIE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GARDNER v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
JALIEN GARDNER
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C, FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PANNELL v. SCHILDMEIR, ET AL
as 1:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
DAVID PANNELL
Defendant:
RONALD SCHILDMEIR, AMANDA BRIDEGROOM and WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
