Cases 71 - 80 of 24,856
Santos v. South Carolina, The State of
as 6:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
Eliseo Santos
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Roberts, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2024cv01720
Plaintiff:
Emory W. Roberts, Jr.
Defendant:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. Kirkland Corr. Ins/ State of South Carolina
as 0:2024cv01674
Petitioner:
Jerome Curry and (Flesh And Blood Man)
Respondent:
Kirkland Corr. Ins/ South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bedford v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2024cv01680
Petitioner:
Emanual Aurmond Bedford
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newberry v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2024cv01678
Petitioner:
Phillip D. Newberry
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newberry v. Cofty et al
as 1:2024cv01679
Plaintiff:
Phillip D. Newberry and Flip
Defendant:
Patricia M. Cofty, Michael J. Prodan, Steve E. Sizemore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Richman v. Graham
as 9:2024cv01635
Petitioner:
Ulysses Richman
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McCray v. Stirling et al
as 9:2024cv01638
Plaintiff:
James Roosevelt McCray
Defendant:
Cpt. Bryan P. Stirling, Cpt. B Bibbs, Lt. Coata Kimbrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2024cv01623
Petitioner:
Mickey Markell Johnson
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hosley v. Jansen
as 1:2024cv01621
Petitioner:
Otis Hosley
Respondent:
Warden Jansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
