Cases 71 - 80 of 438,442
Garland v. Yeaw et al
as 1:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Ms. Kimberly R. Garland
Defendant:
Michael J. Yeaw, Rose H. Chiauzzi, Keri Witherow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carpenter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Ricky Carpenter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Whittaker v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00624
Petitioner:
Chandler B. Whittaker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jennings v. Durham et al
as 9:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
Khalil Jennings
Defendant:
Correction Sgt. M. Durham, Correction Officer Devon Delaney, Correction Officer M. Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Story v. Federal Beureau of Investigation
as 1:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Story
Defendant:
Federal Beureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Story v. Fort Gordon
as 1:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Michael Brandon Story
Defendant:
Fort Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Locey v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 6:2024cv06277
Plaintiff:
Lance Michael Locey
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Ennis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv06273
Plaintiff:
Sabrina C Ennis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
