Cases 71 - 80 of 120,371
(PC) Bonilla v. Superior Court County of Trinity
as 2:2024cv01255
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Superior Court County of Trinity
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Superior Court, County of Siskiyou
as 2:2024cv01257
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Superior Court, County of Siskiyou
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla, v. Tehama County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01252
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Tehama County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Superior Court County of Shasta
as 2:2024cv01254
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Superior Court County of Shasta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tingle v. Defilippis
as 4:2024cv02543
Plaintiff:
Aaron Kristopher Tingle
Defendant:
Steve Defilippis and Law Office of Picone and Defilippis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
N.A. v. U.S.A.
as 4:2024cv02561
Plaintiff:
N.A.
Defendant:
U.S.A. and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hill v. Rita
as 4:2024cv02544
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Rita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Wilhelm v. Mule Creek State Prison
as 2:2024cv01226
Petitioner:
Steve Wilhelm
Respondent:
Mule Creek State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv01220
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Thomas v. Chapa
as 1:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Chapa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
