Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Cases 71 - 80 of 24,268
Sullivan v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04066
Plaintiff: Anthony Sullivan
Defendant: Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Ham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford v. Jumper et al
as 4:2024cv04067
Plaintiff: Anthony Ashford
Defendant: Shawn Jumper and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahl v. USA
as 3:2024cv03090
Petitioner: Adam Dahl
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Floyd v. Ackman et al
as 4:2024cv04068
Plaintiff: Sebron Floyd
Defendant: J Ackman, . Watercotte, Greg Donathan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
First National Property Management L.L.C v. May
as 3:2024mc03005
Petitioner: First National Property Management L.L.C
Respondent: James May
ABM Service Corporation v. Ralph et al
as 3:2024cv03086
Plaintiff: ABM Service Corporation
Defendant: Brett Ralph and Bluestone Insurance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Washington Sr. v. Lewis et al
as 4:2024cv04065
Plaintiff: Mario Devonne Washington Sr.
Defendant: Nathan Lewis, Kyle Winbigler, Kevin Legate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Harris v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2024cv01155
Plaintiff: Rakeem Harris
Defendant: City of Bloomington, Nicholas Doage, Jeff Linden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Crayton v. People of Illinois
as 1:2024cv01153
Petitioner: Keimon Crayton
Respondent: People of Illinois
Not Yet Classified: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carr v. Arbanal et al
as 2:2024cv02081
Plaintiff: Otis Carr
Defendant: . Arbanal, . Wilham, Douglas County Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?