Cases 71 - 80 of 4,207
Snyder v. Fourth Judicial District Court et al
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Raymond Max Snyder
Defendant:
Fourth Judicial District Court, State of Utah, Justin D Heideman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. Hooser et al
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Amanda Allen
Defendant:
Bill Hooser, Tyler Moos, Kayson Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tay v. City of Tulsa et al
as 2:2023cv00932
Plaintiff:
Paul Tay
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, George Theron Bynum, Wendell Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640 Indian Tribal Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harden v. Ogden City Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Shyane Harden
Defendant:
Ogden City Police Department, Ogden School District, Department of Children and Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Serrano et al v. Lehi City et al
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Donnalyn Serrano and Jose Serrano
Defendant:
Lehi City and Russell Poulsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rich v. Marsh et al
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rich
Defendant:
Cody Marsh, Deb Haaland, Department of the Interior, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
