Cases 81 - 90 of 426,119
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
STURTZ v. LAUREL MEDICAL SUPPLIES, INC.
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA STURTZ
Defendant:
LAUREL MEDICAL SUPPLIES, INC. doing business as LAUREL MEDICAL SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GIORDANO v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMIN. COMMISSIONER
as 2:2024cv01870
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W GIORDANO, SR
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ingale et al v. Burns
as 2:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Nitin Ingale, Manisha N Ingale, Prathamesh Ingale and others
Defendant:
Brian S Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
STRADER et al v. AVIS CAR RENTAL et al
as 2:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
VANCE STRADER and MARY STRADER
Defendant:
AVIS CAR RENTAL, CITY OF PITTSBURGH and ALLEGHENY COMMONS'S PARENT COMPANY AND STOCKHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Cole v. Erie Rise Leadership Academy Charter School
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Diana Cole
Defendant:
Erie Rise Leadership Academy Charter School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
BEY v. SCHAEFER
as 2:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
MELLONZO BEY
Defendant:
JENNIFER SCHAEFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
