Cases 81 - 90 of 1,183,878
Berrios v. Quiros
as 3:2024cv00803
Petitioner:
Edwin Eddie Berrios
Respondent:
Angel Quiros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Saxon v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Robert Saxon
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentin v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Jose Valentin
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmona v. Maryellen et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Carmona
Defendant:
Sliya Maryellen, Matthew J Pina, Joel V Ferreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland, Lamundrick v. Blizzard et al
as 1:2024cv21709
Plaintiff:
Lamundrick R. Cleveland
Defendant:
Jason T. Blizzard, Kathryn D. Weston and Amie M. Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson, John D. v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv14133
Plaintiff:
John David Wilson, Jr and John David Wilson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Landreth v. Withers et al
as 5:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
David Landreth
Defendant:
Shannon Withers and George LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oxford v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
Carmen Michelle Oxford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MILES v. GRAHAM
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
RODNEY JEROME MILES
Defendant:
MICHAEL GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Carlin
as 1:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Kilby Dee Williams
Respondent:
Terema Carlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
