Cases 81 - 90 of 155
Wisdom v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al.
as 2:2016cv00471
Plaintiff:
Heath Tyler Wisdom
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles E. Samusis, Jr., Designation and Sentence Computation Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edward Demerson v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2016cv00994
Defendant:
Sheriff Retired Lee Baca, G. Betanos, Jenny Chang and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Demerson
Laura Jane Jarvis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv00791
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Laura Jane Jarvis
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Jarvis et al v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv08039
Plaintiff:
Robert L Jarvis
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc., Aramark Refreshment Services, LLC and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Rita L. Jarvis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2015cv01628
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Rita L Jarvis
Lilley et al v. County of Alameda et al
as 3:2015cv04475
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Lilley , Jarvis Johnson and Daniel Mallory
Defendant:
County of Alameda , Board of Supervisors of Alameda County , Alameda County Social Services Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David James Pangborn v. Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff's et al
as 2:2015cv06812
Defendant:
Avalos, Baudino, Dempsey and others
Plaintiff:
David James Pangborn
Pangborn v. Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff's et al
as 2:2015cv01803
Plaintiff:
David James Pangborn
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff's, Baudino, Glynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarvis v. Ponce
as 2:2015cv01608
Petitioner:
Ken Grandville Jarvis, Jr.
Respondent:
Ponce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
