Cases 81 - 90 of 134
Pierce v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2013cv00667
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Pierce
Defendant:
Kent, County of and Kent County Jail Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Certification of Judgment 1:10-cv-02153 Eastern District of California et al v. Glieberman et al
as 2:2013mc50297
Plaintiff:
BR North 223, LLC
Defendant:
Bernard Glieberman and Bernard Glieberman Revocable Living Trust
Garnishee:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc.
United States of America v. Jendo
as 2:2013mc50226
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mona Jendo
Garnishee:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Getter #184843 v. Woods et al
as 2:2012cv00415
Plaintiff:
Michael Alaf Getter #184843
Defendant:
Jeff Woods, Daniel H. Heyns, Unknown Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. USA
as 2:2012cv13906
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Darryl Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pierce v. Stahl et al
as 4:2012cv13081
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Pierce
Defendant:
Ted A Stahl, Jon A Deimel and Stahls' Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
United States of America v. Camp
as 2:2012mc50975
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Reginald Camp
Garnishee:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc
Pierce v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC as Assignee of Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2012cv12497
Plaintiff:
Julie Pierce
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC as Assignee of Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter et al v. Gracey
as 2:2012cv11087
Plaintiff:
Starellen Carter and Cinnamon Pierce
Defendant:
Judith S. Gracey
Carter et al v. Oakland County Probation Department
as 2:2012cv11091
Plaintiff:
Starellen Carter and Cinnamon Pierce
Defendant:
Oakland County Probation Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
