Cases 81 - 90 of 3,539
Pough v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Pough
Respondent:
William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Jamarr Reed
Defendant:
Kenneth Williams, Doctor HDSP, Nurse Practitioner HDSP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Batchelor, Jr. v. York Holding, Ltd. et al
as 2:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
William A. Batchelor, Jr.
Defendant:
York Holding, Ltd., Changqing Liu, Rayford International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Paduani v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Neftali Paduani
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Brian Williams, Sr., Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Citibank
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
William H Ball
Defendant:
Citibank a New York Corporation doing business as Sears Shop Your Way
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pough v. Gittere et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Pough
Respondent:
William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lasha v. Cosby
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Chelan Lasha
Defendant:
William Cosby, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Anderson v. Seely et al
as 2:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Ray Anderson
Defendant:
Adam Seely, Grant Riley, Justin Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maddox v. Ruebart et al
as 2:2024cv00172
Petitioner:
Kimberly Maddox
Respondent:
William Ruebart and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Gittere et al
as 2:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Brett Jones
Defendant:
William Gittere, James Dzurenda, Gabriel Najera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
