Cases 81 - 90 of 539
Weed v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Chad Weed
Defendant:
Semple, James Dzurenda, Kevin Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coleman et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Hanif Aminuddin, Dhati Coleman, Andre Reed and others
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wierenga v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Amanda Wierenga
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bridges v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
David Bridges
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baraquin v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Gina Stephanie Baraquin
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Rodriguez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Amauri Rodriguez
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Andrews, II
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arpin v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Barry J Arpin
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scot Semple, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anapol v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Ruth Anapol
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Anderson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Victor Anderson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Robert Richeson, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
