Cases 81 - 90 of 1,560
Gibson v. WARDEN CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 2:2022cv04137
Petitioner:
Paul H Gibson
Respondent:
WARDEN CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04127
Plaintiff:
James H. Moon
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
H&N Construction Inc v. Tarkett USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02053
Plaintiff:
H&N Construction Inc
Defendant:
Tarkett USA, Inc., Tarkett Alabama Inc and Tarkett Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wright v. Watson
as 2:2022cv04042
Plaintiff:
Ramone Wright
Defendant:
Michael H Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonee v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2022cv03897
Plaintiff:
Melody H. Bonee
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Harvey v. Franklin County, OH et al
as 2:2022cv03886
Plaintiff:
Nichelle M Harvey
Defendant:
Franklin County, OH, State of Ohio, Bradley P. Toman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bonner et al v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv01967
Plaintiff:
L'Tanya Bonner and Lawrence H. Bonner
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
H.S. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03778
Plaintiff:
H. S.
Defendant:
Red Roof Inns, Inc. and Red Roof Franchising, LLC
R.H. v. Red Roof Inns, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03774
Plaintiff:
R. H.
Defendant:
Red Roof Inns, Inc. and Red Roof Franchising, LLC
Ingram v. Bureau of Prisons, RRM Cincinnati, Residential Reentry Office
as 1:2022cv00589
Petitioner:
Michael H Ingram
Respondent:
RRM Cincinnati and Bureau of Prisons, RRM Cincinnati, Residential Reentry Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
