Cases 81 - 90 of 8,534
Morrison et al v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv20673
Plaintiff:
Gregg Morrison and Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Dollar Tree, Inc., Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BUSBY v. JOHNSON
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BUSBY
Defendant:
BOB JOHNSON, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Carpentar et al
as 4:2024cv10014
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
S. Carpentar and J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Anglin v. ChildNet et al
as 1:2024cv20592
Plaintiff:
Valtshia Lashawn Denise Anglin
Defendant:
ChildNet, Jodi-ann Edwards, Tahnese Veer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Warden, Florida Department of Corrections
as 8:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
Demetrius Dontae Johnson and D.J.
Respondent:
Warden, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. GARRETT
as 3:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
WALTER JOHNSON, III
Respondent:
C GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv60210
Plaintiff:
Arnold Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv20469
Plaintiff:
Arnold Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
