Cases 81 - 90 of 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03018
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv08979
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv01428
Respondent:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. HORNAK et al
as 2:2019cv00509
Respondent:
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, SCOTT BRADY, AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. HORWAK et al
as 1:2019cv00770
Respondent:
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, SCOTT BRADY, AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Warden MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2019cv01526
Respondent:
Judges U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Attorney General of the USA Director and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Dorsey v. United States of America et al
as 3:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Case Manager A. Foura-White, Nurse K. Williams, Counselor Mark Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Dorsey, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
