Cases 81 - 90 of 97
Anita Cagle v. Anti-Aging Essentials Inc et al
as 2:2011cv02940
Defendant:
Anti-Aging Essentials Inc, Belmont Confections Inc, Angel Boulis and others
Plaintiff:
Anita Cagle
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv00655
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Pacific View Motel, Sicuia Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
G. v. Heald et al
as 3:2011cv01490
Plaintiff:
Adam G.
Defendant:
Randy Heald , City of San Mateo , Deann Acton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2011cv00109
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County, Larry Allen Burns , Skomal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Belmontes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2010at01030
Plaintiff:
Jose L Belmontes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Belmontes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2010cv02378
Plaintiff:
Jose L Belmontes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Veal v. City Of Belmont Police Department et al
as 3:2010cv05456
Plaintiff:
Paul Eugene Veal
Defendant:
City Of Belmont Police Department, Peter Lotti, City of Atherton Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Marianne Nestor Cassini v. Christina Tierney Cassini Granata Belmont et al
as 2:2010cv03443
Defendant:
Daria Tierney Cassini, Christina Tierney Cassini Granata Belmont and DOES
Plaintiff:
Marianne Nestor Cassini
Belmont v. Hartley
as 3:2009cv02700
Petitioner:
Santana Belmont
Respondent:
James D Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melgoza-Belmonte v. USA
as 3:2009cv02458
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Gabriel Melgoza-Belmonte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
