Cases 81 - 90 of 594
Bryant v. City of San Antonio et al
as 5:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Kerwin Bryant
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, Det. #2230 FNU Seaton, #2101 R. Valadez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
Jerome Leon Bryant
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Flowers v. Sixth District Court of Lamar County
as 4:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Colby Bryant Flowers
Defendant:
Sixth District Court of Lamar County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v Smith, et al
as 6:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Justin Keith Bryant
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry Smith and Paul Banner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Back v. Arnold et al
as 6:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Robert Back
Defendant:
FNU Arnold, Sgt. FNU Spier, Sgt. FNU Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Ditech Financial, LLC
as 3:2022cv00252
Counter Defendant:
Khaliq Bryant
Defendant:
Ditech Financial, LLC and Ditech Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cardenas Olmos v. Hand et al
as 3:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Estela Guadalupe Cardenas Olmos
Defendant:
Sherry A Hand, A Symmetry Company International LLC, Titan Black LLC doing business as Astute Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Rolle v. Prince et al
as 4:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Thomas Henry Rolle, II
Defendant:
J Prince, Ed Gonzales, Kim Ogg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Sheriff, Smith County
as 6:2021cv00487
Petitioner:
Justin Keith Bryant
Respondent:
Sheriff, Smith County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Woodard v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Daniel Woodard
Defendant:
Bryant Collier, Rocky Moore and M. Marquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
