Cases 81 - 90 of 594
Brinkley et al v. Timco Logistics Systems, LLC
as 3:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
John Brinkley, Theotis Courtney, Johnnie Jones and others
Defendant:
Timco Logistics Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bryant v Smith, et al
as 6:2022cv00103
Plaintiff:
Justin Keith Bryant
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry Smith and Paul Banner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rolle v. Prince et al
as 4:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Thomas Henry Rolle, II
Defendant:
J Prince, Ed Gonzales, Kim Ogg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardenas Olmos v. Hand et al
as 3:2022cv00347
Plaintiff:
Estela Guadalupe Cardenas Olmos
Defendant:
Sherry A Hand, A Symmetry Company International LLC, Titan Black LLC doing business as Astute Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Bryant v. Ditech Financial, LLC
as 3:2022cv00252
Counter Defendant:
Khaliq Bryant
Defendant:
Ditech Financial, LLC and Ditech Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodard v. Collier et al
as 4:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Daniel Woodard
Defendant:
Bryant Collier, Rocky Moore and M. Marquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAGE v. Collier et al
as 6:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
TAYLER MONIC PAGE
Defendant:
Mr. Brian Collier, TDCJ, Lanette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lenoir v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
as 4:2022cv00087
Petitioner:
Bryant P. Lenoir
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bryant v. Sheriff, Smith County
as 6:2021cv00487
Petitioner:
Justin Keith Bryant
Respondent:
Sheriff, Smith County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gibbs v. Collier et al
as 5:2021cv01259
Plaintiff:
Marcello LaCraig Gibbs
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Phonso J. Rayford, John A. Marcum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
