Cases 81 - 90 of 90
Blair v. Simpson
as 5:2009cv00158
Petitioner:
James Blair
Respondent:
Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Blair et al
as 0:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Sherry Renee Blair, Michael Blair, Midland Funding, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Blair v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv00062
Plaintiff:
Wendy Lou Blair
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Richardson et al v. Childers Oil Company, Inc. et al
as 7:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Josephine Richardson, Elaine Painter, Rita Hall and others
Defendant:
Childers Oil Company, Inc., Childers Oil Company, Inc., Childers Oil Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Blair et al v. Byars et al
as 5:2008cv00197
Plaintiff:
Kate Blair, James Anderson and Dwight Warren
Defendant:
Kevin Byars, Ruth Dyars, Pam Mathis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shipp v. Richardson et al
as 3:2007cv00693
Plaintiff:
Chester Shipp
Defendant:
Byron Richardson, Brandon Blair and Lebanon Police Department
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williams et al v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 6:2007cv00356
Plaintiff:
Stanley Williams
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, L Gregory and Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair v. Progress Rail Services Corporation
as 2:2007cv00149
Defendant:
Progress Rail Services Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blair v. SSA
as 6:2007cv00074
Plaintiff:
Fred W. Blair
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Blair et al v. Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00044
Plaintiff:
J. B. Blair, J. B. Blair, Helen Blair and others
Defendant:
Pinnacle Recovery, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
