Cases 81 - 90 of 144
Burns v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2014cv00153
Plaintiff:
Burnadette D Burns
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Burns v Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 1:2014dp20072
Plaintiff:
Barbara Burns
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. , Vail Consulting LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wade v. Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 4:2014cv00382
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Wade
Defendant:
Bureau Of Prisons, FCI Elkton Warden Coakley, M. Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Judd et al
as 1:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
David Easley
Defendant:
Dana Judd, Donald Morgan, Kathy Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grega v. Stell et al
as 1:2014cv00217
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Grega
Defendant:
Robert Stell, Jeff Bradley, Lt. Blaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Forshey, et al
as 4:2013cv02642
Petitioner:
DaJuan Burns
Respondent:
Jay Forshey and Mike DeWine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne et al v. Pummill et al
as 2:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Lowell N. Payne, Clifford L. Rucker, James Robinson and others
Defendant:
Cathy Pummill, Jane Doe Park, Amy Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv01045
Plaintiff:
Amanda L Burns
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burns v. Ford Motor Company General Retirement Plan et al
as 5:2013cv01615
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company General Retirement Plan, UniCare Life & Health Insurance Company and Ford National Employee Services Center
Plaintiff:
Sidney A. Burns
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Burnes v. Obama et al
as 2:2013cv00405
Plaintiff:
Ellyn Burnes
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Robert Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
