Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 223
Gonzalez #761448 v. Bauman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00266
Plaintiff: Fortino Gonzalez #761448
Defendant: Catherine S. Bauman, Unknown Henley, Unknown Giotto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vince Mann v. Catherine Bauman
as 16-2643
Petitioner - Appellant: VINCE MANN
Respondent - Appellee: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Keenan Hestle v. Catherine Bauman, et al
as 16-2620
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEENAN HESTLE
Defendant - Appellee: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, RYAN D. MASTERS, ARUS/Unit Manager and [UNKNOWN] BLOUGH, Correctional Officer
Leo Ambler v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 16-2595
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEO MICHAEL AMBLER
Defendant - Appellee: HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director Michigan Department of Corrections, CARMEN DENISE PALMER, Warden, Warden, GREGORY SKIPPER, Deputy Warden and others
Kenny Meador v. Catherine Bauman
as 16-2557
Petitioner - Appellant: KENNY MEADOR
Respondent - Appellee: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
In re: Mario Rodriguez
as 16-2497
Movant: In re: MARIO H. RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
Ellington #191157 v. Karkkila et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00230
Plaintiff: Erik Anthony Ellington #191157
Defendant: Gary Karkkila, R. Masters, G. Schram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Earvin Davi
as 16-2470
Movant: In re: EARVIN DAVIS
Respondent: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
LaPine #305535 v. Bauman
as 2:2016cv00235
Petitioner: Darrin LaPine #305535
Respondent: Catherine S. Bauman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Larry Richardson v. Catherine Bauman, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2432
Plaintiff - Appellant: LARRY RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee: CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden, JACQUELINE NADEAU, Assistant Deputy Warden, DONALD MANSFIELD, R.U.M. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?