Cases 81 - 90 of 124
Conair Corporation v. Jarden Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv06702
Plaintiff:
Conair Corporation
Defendant:
Jarden Corporation and Jarden Consumer Solutions
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Allison et al v. Conair Corporation
as 3:2013cv00238
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Allison and Stacy A. Litwa
Defendant:
Conair Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rinehart v. Conair Corporation
as 3:2013cv00237
Plaintiff:
Mary L. Rinehart
Defendant:
Conair Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Czuhaj v. Conair Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01901
Plaintiff:
Cynthia L. Czuhaj
Defendant:
Conair Corporation and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02106
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Johnson et al v. Advance Auto Parts Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00345
Defendant:
BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Georgia Pacific LLC, Goodrich Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson and Ruby Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
SEXY HAIR CONCEPTS, LLC v. CONAIR CORPORATION
as 2:2012mc00250
Plaintiff:
SEXY HAIR CONCEPTS, LLC
Defendant:
CONAIR CORPORATION
Objector:
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC
Cause Of Action: Objection
Conair Corporation v. Miele & Cie. KG Kommanditgesellschaft et al
as 1:2012cv05481
Plaintiff:
Conair Corporation
Defendant:
Miele & Cie. KG Kommanditgesellschaft, Miele Inc. and Eugster/Frismag AG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Sexy Hair Concepts, LLC v. Conair Corporation
as 2:2012cv02218
Counter Claimant:
Conair Corporation
Defendant:
Conair Corporation
Counter Defendant:
Sexy Hair Concepts, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sexy Hair Concepts, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
