Cases 81 - 90 of 146
Williams v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00765
Plaintiff:
David M. Williams
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Terry Zink and JTVCC Records
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartmann v. O'Connor et al
as 1:2010cv00725
Plaintiff:
Detlef F. Hartmann
Defendant:
Martin O'Connor, John Vaughn, John Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. Phelps et al
as 1:2010cv00742
Petitioner:
Jeffery Alonzo Simms
Respondent:
Perry Phelps, Carl Danberg and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rogers v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2010cv00623
Plaintiff:
Derek M. Rogers
Defendant:
Dale Rodgers, Correctional Medical Services, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00558
Plaintiff:
Edward Powell
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainier v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00498
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Rainier, Sr.
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Carl Danberg, Richard Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Parkell v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00412
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, David Pierce and others
Plaintiff:
Donald D. Parkell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00396
Plaintiff:
Terence A. Jones
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Rick Figuerelle, Craig Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Beckles et al
as 1:2010cv00362
Plaintiff:
Gregory F. Robinson
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Scaroborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggins v. Markell et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Jack A. Markell, Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.