Cases 81 - 90 of 184
Phillip Brown v Carol Howes
as 2:2009cv14850
Petitioner:
Phillip Brown
Defendant:
Carol Howes
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Durr #484773 v. Haralston et al
as 1:2009cv01116
Plaintiff:
Kamar Durr #484773
Defendant:
Unknown Haralston, Unknown Utter, Margaret Ovellette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diing #692107 v. Howes
as 1:2009cv01058
Petitioner:
Mayen Biar Diing #692107
Respondent:
Carol Howes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bentley v. Howes
as 2:2009cv10106
Petitioner:
Mark Bentley
Respondent:
Carol Howes
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Anthony #231525 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv00849
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Anthony #231525
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Michigan Parole Board, People of the State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell #533184 v. Howes
as 1:2009cv00840
Petitioner:
Josh Duane Russell #533184
Respondent:
Carol Howes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Howes
as 2:2009cv13520
Petitioner:
Reginald Brown
Respondent:
Carol Howes
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Cabbil-Bey #141065 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv00723
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cabbil-Bey #141065
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, Dave Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrick #234426 v. Howes
as 1:2009cv00717
Petitioner:
Kendrick Lee #234426
Respondent:
Carol Howes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Simmons #602400 v. Howes
as 1:2009cv00708
Petitioner:
Leroy Markeith Simmons #602400
Respondent:
Carol Howes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
