Cases 81 - 90 of 231
JORDAN v. BROWN
as 2:2018cv00013
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
JERON JORDAN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. BROWN et al
as 2:2017cv00590
Defendant:
DICK BROWN, MILLER and SHROYER
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MACK TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORTE v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00550
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
DAMON FORTE
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILLMAN v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00548
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
CARLTON HILLMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEWELL v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00544
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS NEWELL
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURNETT v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00543
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
DARYL K. BURNETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRENCH v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00537
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
ROMAN FRENCH
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ABBOTT v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00538
Petitioner:
QUENTIN ABBOTT
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRAZIER v. CARTER
as 2:2017cv00519
Defendant:
K. ALLEN, B. BENDEKOVICH, HEATHER BLASINGANE and others
Plaintiff:
JASPER L FRAZIER
Miscellaneou:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWMAN v. BROWN
as 1:2017cv03736
Petitioner:
WILLIAM R. BOWMAN
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
