Cases 81 - 90 of 172
Aviles Rothchild v. Homan et al
as 1:2018cv11485
Defendant:
Thomas Homan and Thomas Brophy
Plaintiff:
Dean Himbler Aviles Rothchild
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnham v. DeMoura
as 1:2018cv11464
Defendant:
John Dean and Douglas W DeMoura
Plaintiff:
Arthur Burnham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Arnold et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N A
as 1:2018cv11418
Plaintiff:
Dean M. St. Arnold and Lori R. St. Arnold
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv11288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Martignetti et al v. City of Cambridge
as 1:2018cv10980
Plaintiff:
Victor A. Martignetti , David G. Albert , Keith Albert and others
Defendant:
City of Cambridge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Fulton, Jr v. Worcester Superior Court Department et al
as 4:2018cv40048
Defendant:
Worcester Superior Court Department, Worcester County Sheriff's Office, Janet Kenton-Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Fulton, Jr, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Garelick Farms, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv10038
Plaintiff:
Donald Powers
Defendant:
Garelick Farms, LLC and Dean Foods Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Anderson et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2017cv11749
Plaintiff:
Dean Anderson and Mary Ann Anderson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2017cv11749
Plaintiff:
Dean Anderson and Mary Ann Anderson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Morrissey et al
as 1:2017cv11059
Plaintiff:
Brianna J. Adams, Patricia U. Adams, Blenda A. Rice and others
Defendant:
Michael W. Morrissey, Edward J Doherty, Michael Kasprzak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
