Cases 81 - 90 of 170
Pinnell v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01193
Plaintiff:
Alexis Pinnell
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Jason Lowery , Lee Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01192
Plaintiff:
Dalton Harris
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Jason Lowery , Lee Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloran v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01187
Plaintiff:
James C Holloran
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Lee Hatley , Josh Hedge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Oldham et al
as 2:2013cv02373
Plaintiff:
Raynell Williams
Defendant:
Bill Oldham, Robert Moore, McGee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01168
Plaintiff:
Blake Williams
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Jason Lowery , Lee Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rainey v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01167
Plaintiff:
John Rainey
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Jason Lowery , Lee Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01166
Plaintiff:
Cody Scott
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Jason Lowery , Lee Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hallman v. Duncan et al
as 1:2013cv01165
Plaintiff:
Amanda Hallman
Defendant:
Joe Duncan , Jason Lowery , Lee Hatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meeks v. Tec-Com Services Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02332
Plaintiff:
Darryl Meeks
Defendant:
Tec-Com Services Inc. , Robert Allen Jacobs and Debbie Jacobs
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Counter_claimant:
Debbie Jacobs , Robert Allen Jacobs and Tec-Com Services Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Darryl Meeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Carter v. Deck et al
as 2:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Debbie Deck and Shannon Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
