Cases 81 - 90 of 106
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benton v. Sheriff's Civil Processing Dept.
as 3:2014cv00097
Plaintiff:
David Lewis Benton, Sr.
Defendant:
Sheriff's Civil Processing Dept.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Benton v. Louisville Metro Police Dept. & Traffic Div.
as 3:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
David Lewis Benton, Sr.
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Police Dept. & Traffic Div.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Travieso v. City of Covington
as 2:2013cv00094
Plaintiff:
Jose J. Davila Travieso
Defendant:
City of Covington, Section 8, Kenton Justice Dept. Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. U.S. Dept Of Urban Development et al
as 5:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Dept Of Urban Development, Kentucky Com. On Human Rights, Lafonda Stallworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. The Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2012cv00842
Plaintiff:
Claude Cox
Defendant:
The Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. City of Shelbyville et al
as 3:2012cv00754
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Williams and Gardner Williams
Defendant:
City of Shelbyville, Shelbyville Police Dept., Robert A. Schutte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
v. Gamble et al
as 3:2012cv00616
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Kentucky Dept. of Corr. and Steve Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Kentucky Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2012cv00528
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
Kentucky Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Spencer et al
as 5:2011cv00409
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Timothy G. Spencer, Debbie K. Spencer, Kentucky Dept. of Revenue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
