Cases 81 - 90 of 168
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, LLC v. DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.
as 2:2014cv00420
Plaintiff:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, LLC
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
FERGUSON et al v. NOBLES
as 2:2014cv01439
Plaintiff:
ERIC FERGUSON , MICHELLE SANTANA , EFRAIN SANTANA and others
Defendant:
ANGEL NOBLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PSORAS v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2014cv01206
Petitioner:
DUKE ROLAND PSORAS
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ACKERMAN et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05853
Plaintiff:
PAULA ACKERMAN , RUBY ADAMS , CARL AGNELLO and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duke v. Gavin et al
as 4:2013cv01969
Petitioner:
Marshall Elwood Duke
Respondent:
Wayne J. Gavin and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COX v. RUSHIE et al
as 2:2013cv03028
Defendant:
MICHAEL WHITEACRE, JORDAN RUSHIE, ROXANNE GRINAGE and others
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL L. COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DUKES v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
SHERRON DUKES
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, LOUIS GIORLA, JOHN DELANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUKE v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv05179
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DUKE
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
McMillian v. Walsh et al
as 1:2012cv01707
Plaintiff:
Corliveetho McMillian
Defendant:
Jerome Walsh, Norman Demming, Kathy Brittin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REID-DOUGLAS v. MCANANY et al
as 2:2012cv01168
Plaintiff:
STEVEN REID-DOUGLAS
Defendant:
MCANANY, LEGGETT, POZVIAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
