Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Johnny Cupcake Inc. et al v. U-Store-It Trust et al
as 3:2009cv30034
Plaintiff:
Johnny Cupcake Inc. and John M Earle
Defendant:
U-Store-It Trust, Clark Perez and Jo-Ann Perez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnny Cupcake Inc. et al v. U-Store-It Trust et al
as 1:2009cv30034
Plaintiff:
Johnny Cupcake Inc. and John M Earle
Defendant:
U-Store-It Trust, Clark Perez and Jo-Ann Perez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Wattleton v. Daschle
as 4:2009cv40033
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Tom Daschle
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hardcastle et al
as 1:2009cv10109
Plaintiff:
James Hardcastle, Kedrick F. O'Meara, Joseph Santulli and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hardcastle et al v. Daschle
as 4:2009cv40014
Plaintiff:
James Hardcastle, Kedrick F. O'Meara, Joseph Santulli and others
Defendant:
Tom Daschle
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wattleton v. Johnson
as 4:2009cv40004
Plaintiff:
David Earl Wattleton
Defendant:
Edward Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Northeast Concepts, Inc. et al v. Town of Holland et al
as 3:2008cv30219
Plaintiff:
Northeast Concepts, Inc., Nugunot Farms, James Lamountain and others
Defendant:
Town of Holland, Holland Police Department, Holland Conservation Commission and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. Storey et al
as 4:2008cv40084
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Earl H Storey, Kathleen M Storey, Martin Koffman and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv11824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
