Cases 81 - 90 of 165
Artis v. Uhler et al
as 9:2014cv01116
Plaintiff:
Clarence L. Artis, Jr.
Defendant:
Donald G. Uhler, Mary Kowalchuk, D. Mass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schneiderman v. Evans Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00726
Plaintiff:
Eric T. Schneiderman
Defendant:
Evans Bancorp, Inc. and Evans Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Guity et al v. Scott Michael Mishkin, PC et al
as 2:2014cv05043
Defendant:
Justice W. Gerard Asher, Hon. Ruth C. Balkin, Hon. Cheryl E. Chambers and others
Plaintiff:
Paula F. Guity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sloan et al v. New York State Board Of Elections et al
as 1:2014cv01071
Plaintiff:
Sam Sloan, Neil V. Grimaldi, Nereida Narveaz and others
Defendant:
New York State Board Of Elections , Eric T. Schneiderman , Douglas A. Kellner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arrington et al v. Katz et al
as 1:2014cv04606
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Arrington, Joseph Ficalora, William Jefferson and others
Defendant:
Melinda Katz, Eric T. Schneiderman and State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brooks-Seibert et al v. Schneiderman et al
as 1:2014cv00532
Plaintiff:
Michelle Brooks-Seibert and Darryl Seibert
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman and Joseph A. D'Amico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Romero v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2014cv04844
Plaintiff:
Romero Anderson
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, Eric T. Schneiderman, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Schneiderman
as 1:2014cv03663
Petitioner:
Joanne Baker
Respondent:
Eric T. Schneiderman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neroni v. Peebles et al
as 3:2014cv00584
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Neroni
Defendant:
David E. Peebles, Matthew Holmes, Gary L. Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
