Cases 81 - 90 of 271
HOGGE v. WHITAKER et al
as 1:2019cv04949
Defendant:
DIRECTOR HUGH HURWITZ, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MATTHEW WHITAKER and others
Plaintiff:
KERRY GORDON HOGGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FISHER v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2018cv16793
Plaintiff:
TONY FISHER and KELLIE REHANNA
Defendant:
ANNA MORFE, UNIT DOE, MR. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LACEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2018cv13940
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
ADRIAN L LACEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEWIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2018cv13393
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MARK S INCH and ACTING DIRECTOR OF BOP
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VEGA v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2018cv13180
Respondent:
JANE DOE NO.'S 1-10, JOHN DOE NO.'S 1-10, WARDEN DAVID ORTIZ and others
Petitioner:
GERALDO VEGA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KORNHAUSER v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2018cv11373
Plaintiff:
JULIUS KORNHAUSER
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER WARD, F.C.I. FORT DIX, WARDEN DAVID E. ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LACEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2018cv11176
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
ADRIAN L LACEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROBERTS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2018cv09928
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN ROBERTS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv09199
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. WASHINGTON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, R. GALLOP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
PARKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv08674
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN PARKER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
