Cases 81 - 90 of 96
Kuck v. Schriro et al
as 2:2008cv00756
Plaintiff:
Albert Kuck
Defendant:
Dora Schriro, Bernnie Rollins, Herb Haley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Merrick v. Schriro et al
as 4:2008cv00209
Plaintiff:
JD Merrick
Defendant:
Dora Schriro, Mike Linderman, Greg Fizer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pramoj Na Ayudhya v. Fizer
as 4:2008cv00176
Petitioner:
Pongthep Pramoj Na Ayudhya
Respondent:
Fizer and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conroy v. Fizer et al
as 2:2007cv02474
Petitioner:
Thomas M. Conroy
Respondent:
Craig Fizer and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Schriro et al
as 4:2007cv00576
Plaintiff:
John P Baker
Defendant:
Dora Schriro, Richard Pratt, Yolonda Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Fierro v. Richardson et al
as 4:2007cv00580
Plaintiff:
Jose Abel Fierro
Defendant:
Richardson, Sandra Perfetto, Lance R Hetmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron v. Schriro et al
as 4:2007cv00560
Petitioner:
Wesley Ian Aaron
Respondent:
Dora B Schriro, Greg Fizer and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Faulkner v. Fizer et al
as 2:2007cv01822
Petitioner:
Dale Faulkner
Respondent:
G Fizer and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wesley v. Schriro et al
as 2:2007cv01297
Plaintiff:
Samuel Acy Wesley, II
Defendant:
Dora Schriro, Charles Ryan, Charles Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Fizer, et al
as 2:2007cv01237
Petitioner:
Stacy Anderson
Respondent:
Fizer and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
