Cases 81 - 90 of 103
Burrell v. Myers et al
as 3:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Charles Davis Burrell
Defendant:
Robert Lee Myers, III, Allon Devon White, Tameka Maria Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holmes v. Director Of Department Of Corrections
as 1:2011cv00057
Petitioner:
Michael E. Holmes
Respondent:
Director Of Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Curry v. Holmes Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00849
Plaintiff:
Luke H. Curry, III
Defendant:
Holmes Enterprises, Inc. and Richmond Roofing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gutierrez et al v. Stansberry
as 1:2010cv01312
Petitioner:
George A. Gutierrez, Kevin P. Boody, Wayne N. Gardner and others
Respondent:
Particia Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Spain v. Hunter Holmes McGuire Veteran's Medical Center
as 3:2010cv00148
Plaintiff:
Joyce Spain
Defendant:
Hunter Holmes McGuire Veteran's Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Holmes v. Menegati et al
as 3:2009cv00591
Plaintiff:
Sandra Holmes
Defendant:
Fernando Braz Menegati and Braz Lines Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Holmes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2009cv00436
Plaintiff:
Edward Randolph Holmes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
